|
Todd Turner loves natural
stones. Sarah Whitlock prefers synthetic.
CLAIRE DEUTSHER talks
to two respected and innovative designers with
contrasting views.
To the untrained eye there is no difference between
natural and synthetic gemstones. Yet for Sydney-based
designers Sarah Whitlock and Todd Turner, the
source of a stone directly influences their work.
Both designers are talented, fresh and creative,
and who like shaping timeless pieces using coloured
gemstones. Yet each value different qualities
in synthetic and natural stones when forming the
base of their work. Whitlock loves the brilliance
of synthetic, while Turner prefers guileless natural
stones.
Whitlock chooses synthetic stones to create an
impression of "glamour without the pretension".
Working under the name Flying Lobster Jewellery,
she has developed popularity around Sydney for
her bold and bright use of coloured gemstones.
"I tend to use synthetic mainly for size,
colour, and therefore cost.
The cut and colours have so much more depth than
natural stones and suit what I do a bit more,"
she explained.
Whitlock describes her work as big, fun and able
to be seen from a distance. Arabic floral ornament,
Erte (a 1920s fashion designer), Gustav Klimt,
and Chinese jade carving influence her work.
Although she's not locked into purely using synthetic
stones, the size availability of the laboratory
gem works well with her ring designs. "Synthetics
tend to work a bit better for the rings I do,
I usually use a large stone, they fit the design.
For smaller pieces I'll just use natural."
Turner, on the other hand, uses natural and organic
forms as inspiration for his work. Therefore he
works predominantly with natural stones to give
a more thorough expression. "I love that
natural gems are found in the ground and have
occurred through a natural evolution. Also natural
stones are often flawed and that has an appeal
to me - if you look at anything in nature it's
often flawed. In the market, a stone with great
colour will demand top money, but I can see a
stone that does not have that; it might be washed
out and to me it inspires me to create something."
Inconsistencies in natural stones don't work
as well for Whitlock who likes to emphasise strong
colour.
"I love the size, intensity and range of
colour in synthetic stones. Some of the colours
I've never seen in a natural stone rose sapphire
when they're really large they're just such a
deep colour."
Whitlock, who always refers to man-made stones
as synthetic, said many of her customers don't
initially realise the stones she uses are true
gems.
"Usually they think it's glass. I have to
explain that it's grown like a natural stone and
once they know that they think it's a lot better
than what they originally thought. The customers
don't seem to have a problem, so far nobody has
said they won't buy it because it's synthetic."
While Whitlock is happy to create pieces using
natural stone if it is her customer's preference,
she doesn't think she would always achieve the
same flamboyant result. "A lot of the naturals
have flaws in them, or the colour isn't even or
intense."
Although Turner also enjoys colour in his work,
it's precisely the vibrancy of colour in synthetic
gems, which doesn't appeal to him. "Synthetic
stones are usually perfect, that's something I
don't like about them. But natural gemstones have
character like recently I found this beautiful
pink spinel and I knew instantly what I was going
to do with the stone. I try to go after stones
that are flawed you don't have to pay a lot of
money to have a beautiful stone."
Turner uses a wide range of colour gemstones,
exploring beyond the conventional precious gems.
"About 90 per cent of my work is colour stone.
When I think of gem stones I think of colour,
like when I look at diamonds I sometimes think
they have very limited expression.
How rare is a diamond really? Pretty much someone
in everyone's family has a diamond, but who has
a beautiful tourmaline or spinel they're the real
rare stones."
"Working with materials that are created
from the earth is one of the most pleasing aspects
of jewellery to me," he said.
Whitlock and Turner differ further regarding the
use of treated natural stones. She considers treated
stones similar to synthetic while he believes
treatment is part of the art. "Treated naturals
have all been a bit adjusted, nature didn't make
them that way," Whitlock said.
"People say 'I wouldn't buy a treated stone',
but then I ask 'why would you even begin to sculpt
or shape gold?' Otherwise you'd just wear it around
your neck in a nugget. You treat it for the desired
effect," Turner said.
Neither Turner or Whitlock caters too much to
fashion trends, preferring to create timeless
pieces appealing to people of all ages. Further,
neither have a particular market in mind when
they're designing their jewellery. "My work
is always evolving.
At the end of the day, whether I'm inspired by
organic form, architecture, I always try to create
a piece that you cannot tell whether it was made
today or several hundred years ago," Turner
said. .
Whitlock said her individual pieces of jewellery
appeal to a myriad of women.
"My customers range from early 20s to 80s.
I think they're people who appreciate a bit of
ornamentation, personal adornment," she said.
Although both designers have different preferences
for the type of stones they choose to primarily
work with, each believe in the benefits of natural
and synthetic stones, claiming there's a market
in both.
|